Skip to main content
Glama
传承·交大 MCP

传承·交大 MCP

by Flagwill

Related Servers

Alternatives to 传承·交大 MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to query a student's eLearning assignments and deadlines, timetable, exams, grades, library resources, notices, campus card balance, dorm electricity, and read-only mail, and to download course files.
      740 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable AI clients to search SJTU course.sjtu.plus courses, teachers, and reviews, inspect followed, ignored, and enrolled records plus community points, and, after explicit confirmation, publish or manage reviews, votes, and course notifications through the official user API.
      28
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to inspect enrolled courses, extract readable text from course documents, track upcoming deadlines, view announcements, and retrieve assignment details through the platform’s REST API.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to create courses, upload lecture recordings, run the transcription and generation pipeline, retrieve study sheets and flashcards, and export Anki decks. It supports both local operation and a hosted instance with account-token access.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables teachers, through AI assistants, to view courses, assignments, and student submissions, download submission files, and save grades with feedback after explicit confirmation via the Moodle REST API.
      7
      112 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 51 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tool set covers many distinct subdomains, but several material and points tools have overlapping boundaries. Examples include share_get_course_materials vs share_list_course_materials, share_get_download_url vs share_download_material vs share_purchase_material, and share_get_points_overview vs separate quota/redeem tools. Descriptions help, but an agent can still hesitate among similar-looking options.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use a consistent share_ snake_case prefix, and most follow a verb_noun pattern. Minor deviations include noun/status-style names such as share_auth_status and share_lesson_sync_status, but the overall convention is predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 51 tools, the surface is very heavy and contains many granular operations across auth, courses, materials, comments, points, and profile. While the domain is broad, several tools could likely be consolidated or grouped, making the set harder to navigate than necessary.

    Completeness5/5

    Coverage is extensive: authentication, profile management, course discovery, material lifecycle, comments, ratings, reports, points transfer/redemption, banners, and lesson sync are all represented. The server appears to cover the platform's main CRUD and workflow operations with few obvious dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessOutdated data