kimi-debug-tunnel
Related Servers
Alternatives to kimi-debug-tunnel
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceDelegates coding tasks to the locally installed Kimi Code CLI, reusing its auth, models, and configuration while adding tools for sessions, replies, model discovery, live turn steering, and history access.713 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceBridges MCP clients to Moonshot AI's Kimi Code CLI, enabling file analysis, brainstorming, batch tasks, code reviews, and session management within editors like Claude Desktop and Cursor.14744 npm1MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides Claude Code with an asynchronous expert advisory service via kimi CLI, maintaining conversation-level memory and automatically binding to kimi sessions for cost-effective guidance at key checkpoints.5-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceBridges Kimi Code CLI to OpenAI Computer Use, enabling Kimi to control local macOS applications via MCP.6 npm6MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables IDE agents like Cursor and Windsurf to orchestrate kiro-cli with advanced session management, process pooling for 10x faster responses, and multi-project workflow support through isolated contexts.1611MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceWindows-first MCP bridge for Kimi Code CLI, exposing code analysis, editing, sessions, and diagnostics as tools for AI agents.621 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 29 tools
Several tools have heavily overlapping purposes: execute_prompt vs chat_with_session both send prompts, and watch_session/continue_watch overlap with run_flow/execute_workflow/continue_workflow. poll_session and get_watch_result also both serve as status/result checks, making misselection likely despite the detailed descriptions.
Naming is mostly consistent snake_case verb_noun: list_*, get_*, execute_*, continue_* are clear patterns. Minor deviations like memory_set (noun-first) vs set_watch_output, and the semantically close run_flow vs execute_workflow, prevent a perfect score.
With 29 tools this exceeds the 25+ threshold that reads as too many for a focused server. While the domain spans sessions, workflows, policies, memory, and grading, the count feels bloated, especially with redundant execution/watch mechanisms.
The tool surface covers session creation and observation, workflow execution, policy decisions, memory CRUD, and result grading. Minor gaps exist—there is no explicit session deletion or template update/delete—but agents can complete core workflows without hitting dead ends.