get_memory
Retrieve a complete memory record with full edit history and related connections.
Instructions
Fetch a single memory's full record, including its edit history and relations.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uid | Yes |
Retrieve a complete memory record with full edit history and related connections.
Fetch a single memory's full record, including its edit history and relations.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uid | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavioral traits. It describes output contents but omits safety guarantees (e.g., read-only, no side effects) and any error conditions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single efficient sentence with key elements front-loaded. Could add minor context without inflation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequately covers the tool's purpose and main output features but lacks details on exact return structure or edge cases; no output schema exists to compensate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the uid parameter beyond its role as an identifier; missing format instructions or origin guidance.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the verb 'fetch', resource 'memory', and specifies inclusion of edit history and relations, distinguishing it from siblings like get_relations and recall.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus other retrieval siblings (recall, search, list_by_domain). The intended use case is implied but not clarified.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Filipe-Soares-de-Almeida/MemAI'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server