Listar Apontamentos de Horas

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate read-only, non-destructive, idempotent, open-world. The description adds value by detailing client-side pagination (50 per page, fetches all then filters) and listing return fields, without contradicting annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, well-structured, and front-loaded. It starts with the purpose, then lists required parameters, optional filters, pagination note, and return fields. Every sentence adds value with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only list tool with 7 parameters (3 required) and no output schema, the description fully covers parameter semantics, pagination behavior, and return fields. It references sister tools for ID lookups, making it self-contained for an agent to execute correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions, but the description adds practical guidance: referencing ekyte_list_workspaces for workspace_id, ekyte_list_users for user_id, and explaining the date format. This cross-tool context is highly valuable beyond the schema alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Lista apontamentos de horas no Ekyte para um workspace em um período', specifying the verb (list), resource (time entries), and scope (workspace, date range). It distinguishes from sibling tools that create, update, or delete entries.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description outlines required parameters (workspace_id, date_from, date_to) and optional filters, plus clarifies client-side pagination. Although no alternative tools are mentioned for comparison, the usage context is clear and sufficient for an agent to understand when to call this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.