Skip to main content
Glama
FernanMoreno

domoai-mcp

by FernanMoreno

Related Servers

Alternatives to domoai-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables smart home automation via MCP with human-in-the-loop approval gates, providing device discovery, state queries, policy checks, and proposal-based execution of actions and scenes that only proceed after explicit user confirmation, with full audit logging.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables control of ECHONETLite home automation devices like air conditioners and sensors via MCP, supporting HVAC management and real-time monitoring.
      14
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables control and management of smart home devices across multiple rooms through specialized MCP servers. Supports lights, thermostats, fans, and ovens with room-specific rules and automatic persistence.
      5
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A powerful MCP server that enables AI assistants to discover, commission, and control Matter-compatible smart home devices through a standardized interface.
      8 npm
      8
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct lifecycle stages, but execute_plan, schedule_plan, and commit_or_schedule_bundle have overlapping boundaries since 'bundle' is never clearly separated from 'plan.' The validate_* and schedule/cancel pairs are otherwise reasonably distinguishable with the help of their descriptions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The set consistently uses snake_case verb_noun names such as get_state, validate_plan, list_scheduled_plans, and cancel_recurring_schedule. The main deviation is commit_or_schedule_bundle, which combines two actions in one name, but overall the pattern is predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 20 tools, the server sits in the heavier range, and the plan/bundle/schedule/recurring variations add conceptual surface area even if the domain is broad. Most tools earn their place for a full energy-management workflow, but the count is borderline and would benefit from consolidation.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core lifecycle well: validation, approval, execution, one-time scheduling, recurring schedules, cancellation, audit, and optimization scenarios. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct way to retrieve a single plan/approval or inspect raw capabilities, but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues