Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to pkg-booper

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with the npm registry, covering package intel, dist-tags, trusted publisher configuration, access and team governance, tokens, security advisories, and publishing, with read-only tools by default.
      3
      34 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents and CI to vet npm dependencies before they reach the lockfile, flagging hallucinated, slopsquatted, or otherwise risky packages with evidence-backed verdicts.
      3
      56 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to vet npm and PyPI packages before installation, reporting typosquats, vulnerabilities in the selected version, publisher changes, and names that don't exist or were published within the last 30 days. It also exposes DNS, WHOIS, email, JWT and file/image utilities as tools over Streamable HTTP, with no signup or API key required.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to automatically verify npm packages against the live registry before installation, flagging hallucinated, slopsquatted, or otherwise suspicious packages with risk verdicts.
      8 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables npm registry operations from MCP clients like Claude Code and Cursor, with 64 tools for package intelligence, security audits, dependency analysis, org/team management, and write operations like deprecate and unpublish.
      64
      335 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    boop (version lookup) and sniff (security analysis) are clearly distinct, and clear-cache is unambiguous. The only overlap is big-sniff-file vs big-sniff-list, which differ solely by input source (package.json vs provided list), though the descriptions do clarify the boundary.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use the same kebab-case, pkg-booper- prefixed pattern, which is highly consistent. However the actionable verbs are playful and non-self-documenting (boop, sniff, big-sniff), so the scheme is predictable but not transparently descriptive.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools are well-scoped for an npm lookup-and-security-inspection server, with no filler. Each tool maps to a distinct capability (version lookup, single analysis, two batch modes, cache management).

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers version lookup, single/batch security analysis, and cache control, forming a coherent lifecycle. Minor gaps exist around per-package detail (license, maintainers, diff/compare) that agents might want but can work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues