Skip to main content
Glama
README.md
# nano-pay · Feeless402

<!-- mcp-name: com.feeless402/nano-pay -->

Self-custodied Nano (XNO) wallet + x402 payment client **and** merchant
server, built for AI agents. Client spends; `nano-pay serve` earns — paid
endpoints, on-ledger verification/settlement (no facilitator), a starter
faucet, and the `railHint` x402 extension that teaches visiting agents how
to onboard (see SPEC-railhint.md). Site: site/index.html + site/llms.txt.

**The pitch, in one number:** the same $5 buys 5,000 API calls paid as
per-call USDC-on-Base x402 payments (merchants floor prices at 0.001 USDC),
or hundreds of thousands of calls paid in Nano at true metered prices
($0.0000096/call observed live at nano-gpt.com, confirmed on-ledger).
Top up once, micropay forever.

## Install

```bash
pip install feeless402    # needs Python 3.10+; pulls nanopy + requests
# (from a checkout: pip install -e .)
nano-pay init             # creates ~/.nano-pay/wallet.json (chmod 600)
```

## Agent flow

```bash
nano-pay topup 5                    # quote: $5 USDC-BASE → ~12.3 XNO (NanSwap)
nano-pay topup 5 --execute          # create order (set NANSWAP_API_KEY)
#   → send USDC to the returned deposit address; XNO arrives in 30-60s
nano-pay receive                    # pocket incoming XNO
nano-pay quote https://nano-gpt.com/api/v1/chat/completions \
    --json '{"model":"gpt-5-nano","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"hi"}]}'
nano-pay pay   https://nano-gpt.com/api/v1/chat/completions \
    --json '{"model":"gpt-5-nano","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"hi"}]}'
```

`pay` handles the whole x402 handshake: request → parse the 402 quote
(both the x402nano/`PAYMENT-REQUIRED` v2 dialect and the NanoGPT/`accepts`
v1 dialect) → price-cap check → sign a send state block locally → retry
with `PAYMENT-SIGNATURE` + `X-PAYMENT` headers. The server settles the
block via its facilitator; nothing is broadcast unless the server accepts.
If the merchant's reply is lost or is not a 2xx, the client asks the
ledger about the block hash it signed before reporting anything: the
receipt's `settled` is `true`, `false`, or `"indeterminate"`, never a
guess. A block that landed is never re-paid — re-present the same one.
The client now does that re-presentation itself: every payment is journaled
next to the wallet (`pending-payments.json`) before it is sent, and a retry —
in the same call or after a crash — re-sends the same signed block with an
`X-PAYMENT-PROOF` header (the payer's signature over the block hash, method and
path). The server honors a proven re-presentation for 24 hours, so an observer
replaying a public block cannot use up the payer's retries. (v0.2.9; reported
privately by [giskard09](https://github.com/giskard09), who also re-verified
the fix with an independent harness — see advisory GHSA-cx37-j5vc-c967. v0.2.10
adds two follow-ups from that re-verification: a block of unknown age is never
treated as inside the window, and forwarded IP headers are trusted only from a
configured proxy.)

## Design notes

- **Self-custody:** seed never leaves `~/.nano-pay/wallet.json` (0600).
- **No node required:** public RPC failover (rpc.nano.to, somenano,
  rainstorm.city, nanoslo); all signing and PoW happen locally (nanopy
  C extension). RPC `work_generate` is tried first, local PoW is the
  fallback (~25s). The CLI pre-caches work for your *next* block after it
  has printed the result of the current one, so steady-state payments are
  instant. Library callers opt in: `send()`, `receive_all()` and
  `request_with_payment()` take `prework=` and default to **off**, because
  pre-caching blocks for minutes and must never sit on a request path.
- **Safety rails:** per-payment price cap (`--max-xno`, default 0.05);
  `quote` command inspects any endpoint's price without paying;
  balance is always re-synced from the network, never trusted locally.
- **Top-ups without custody:** `topup` quotes/creates swaps directly with
  NanSwap's API (1,400+ input assets, ~$0.02 minimum). This tool never
  holds or routes funds.

## Fork-hazard note (x402 payments)

An x402 payment signs a block the *server* broadcasts. If the server
errors after receiving the block, it may still settle it late. The wallet
re-syncs its frontier from the network before every operation, so a late
settlement is picked up naturally; a competing block signed in the
meantime simply makes one of the two invalid (funds are never at risk,
but don't fire concurrent payments from one wallet).

## Status

Beta (v0.2.11). Proven on mainnet with real funds: live paid calls to
NanoGPT ($0.0000096/call, confirmed on-ledger), full merchant loop
(verify → settle → confirm, no facilitator), PoW-gated faucet claims,
and a complete stranger-agent lifecycle (fresh wallet → PoW claim →
paid API call → confirmed) in under 3 minutes. 55-test suite covers the
payment path offline (two faucet tests need the optional `mcp` extra).
Not audited — keep only working capital in it.

## Listings

- [gold-402](https://github.com/Haustorium12/gold-402) — curated x402
  directory; the `/premium` reference endpoint is shelved under APIs and
  this Python client under SDKs.
- [Official MCP registry](https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io) —
  `com.feeless402/nano-pay`.
- [agent-tools.cloud](https://agent-tools.cloud) — x402, MCP, and A2A
  entries.

## Security notes (read before holding real funds)

- **Self-custody**: the seed lives only in `~/.nano-pay/*.json` (0600).
  No tool or log path ever prints it. Back it up offline.
- **Working capital only**: this is beta wallet software. Keep a few
  dollars in it, not your savings.
- **Spend caps**: `pay` refuses quotes above `--max-xno` (default 0.05).
  MCP `x402_pay` enforces the same cap parameter.
- **railHint is advisory**: hints from remote servers are untrusted
  input. This client never executes remote bootstrap strings; it only
  acts on structured offers that pass its own checks, and `accepts`
  always binds, never the hint.
- **Merchant fork guard**: servers cache accepted frontiers and reject
  duplicate-frontier blocks; payer balance/frontier/signature are
  verified against the live ledger before settlement.
- **Behind a proxy**: the merchant believes `X-Real-IP` /
  `X-Forwarded-For` only from `F402_TRUSTED_PROXIES` (default
  `127.0.0.1,::1`); any other peer is identified by its socket address.
  If your reverse proxy runs on another host, add its address there, and
  have it overwrite both headers (`proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;`).
- **Run one worker**: the fork guard (`_seen_previous`) and the replay
  bound (`_replays`) are per-process, in-memory. Under `uvicorn
  --workers N` each worker keeps its own copy, so two workers can accept
  the same payer frontier and one of the two blocks loses the fork race.
  Serve a single process (scale with a lock in front, not with workers)
  unless those guards are moved to shared storage. The ledger poll budget
  is a single value for the whole path (`verify.CONFIRM_WAIT_S`), so the
  merchant settle loop and the x402 client look at the chain for the same
  time; a worker that gives up earlier than that reports "indeterminate"
  for a payment that did land.
- Not audited. MIT — no warranty.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Scored across 6 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct action: wallet status, quote retrieval, cross-rail comparison, payment execution, faucet claim, and swap quote. The x402_* prefix groups the payment flow while the others are clearly separate operations.

Naming Consistency4/5

Names are snake_case and mostly use a resource_action pattern (wallet_status, x402_pay, faucet_claim), but the x402_ prefix creates a subgroup and topup_quote is action-first. Minor inconsistency, but all are readable and predictable.

Tool Count5/5

Six tools is well-scoped for a nano-payment server, covering the essential operations without redundancy or bloat. Each tool earns its place.

Completeness4/5

The core lifecycle is covered: get funds (faucet), check balance, quote, compare rails, pay, and top-up quote. Missing direct transfer or history tools, but these are out of scope for the x402-focused design.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive