Skip to main content
Glama
Fatih0234

webx-mcp

by Fatih0234
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to webx-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • WebFetch.MCP

      manooll
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables local LLMs to search the web and fetch clean content from URLs without API keys, using SearxNG and Mozilla Readability.
      2
      36
      MIT

    • SearXNG MCP Server

      benreichman
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables web search and content scraping from multiple engines via a local SearXNG instance, allowing AI assistants to retrieve and extract web content.
      1
      -

    • mcp-searxng

      kassol
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform web searches and read URL content via a SearXNG instance.
      2
      14 npm
      MIT

    • searxng-crawl4ai-mcp

      siosig
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform web searches and page fetching/crawling through self-hosted SearXNG and Crawl4AI, without depending on commercial search or scraping APIs.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    web_search and web_read have clearly distinct purposes: discovery versus retrieval. The descriptions explicitly distinguish candidate snippets from full readable content, so an agent can easily choose the right tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools use consistent snake_case with the same web_ prefix and a clear verb (search, read). There are no naming deviations.

    Tool Count4/5

    Two tools is slightly under the typical 3-15 range, but for a focused search-and-read server each tool is essential and none is redundant. The minimal count is reasonable for the narrow purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle of discovering sources and then reading them is covered, with no obvious dead ends. Minor capability gaps remain for JS-heavy or authenticated pages, but the tool surface itself is coherent for basic web access.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources