get_authors

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses the prerequisite (synth selected) but does not mention error handling or what happens if no synth is selected. Since it's a read operation, no side effects are expected, but the behavior is not fully elaborated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no redundant information. Front-loaded with purpose and includes a critical prerequisite. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple parameterless tool without an output schema, the description covers the purpose and a key precondition. It does not specify the output format (e.g., array of strings), but the behavior is generally clear. Slight lack of completeness due to missing output description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters and schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 4. The description does not need to add parameter details; it correctly describes the tool's input-independent behavior.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and resource 'list of all unique preset authors/creators' with scope 'in the currently loaded presets'. It is distinct from sibling tools like get_categories or filter_presets.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides a use case ('filtering by favorite sound designers') and a prerequisite ('Requires a synth to be selected first'). Does not explicitly state when not to use or name alternatives, but the context is clear for a simple parameterless tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.