Skip to main content
Glama

active_airdrop_farms

Identify active airdrop and points-farming opportunities by analyzing DefiLlama yield gaps, with realistic APY, TVL, capital requirements, and confidence scores.

Instructions

Active airdrop / points-farming opportunities. Detected from DefiLlama yield gaps (where reported APY exceeds base+rewards = likely points program). Includes realistic APY, TVL, capital required, confidence score. Sourced from Suki defi_scanner.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNo
min_apyNofilter floor pct (realistic APY)
min_tvl_usdNofilter pools <X TVL
chainNofilter (ethereum, base, arbitrum, etc.)

Implementation Reference

  • Schema/definition of the 'active_airdrop_farms' tool, describing its purpose (airdrops/points-farming opportunities from DefiLlama yield gaps) and input parameters (limit, min_apy, min_tvl_usd, chain).
    {
        "name": "active_airdrop_farms",
        "description": "Active airdrop / points-farming opportunities. "
                       "Detected from DefiLlama yield gaps (where reported "
                       "APY exceeds base+rewards = likely points program). "
                       "Includes realistic APY, TVL, capital required, "
                       "confidence score. Sourced from Suki defi_scanner.",
        "inputSchema": {
            "type": "object",
            "properties": {
                "limit": {"type": "integer", "default": 10},
                "min_apy": {"type": "number", "default": 0,
                             "description": "filter floor pct (realistic APY)"},
                "min_tvl_usd": {"type": "number", "default": 0,
                                  "description": "filter pools <X TVL"},
                "chain": {"type": "string",
                            "description": "filter (ethereum, base, arbitrum, etc.)"},
            },
        },
    },
  • The TOOLS list that registers all tool definitions including 'active_airdrop_farms' as one of the available MCP tools.
    TOOLS = [
        {
            "name": "top_yield_farms",
            "description": "Latest 24h top DeFi yield farm picks with realistic "
                           "APY (emissions stripped), risk notes, TVL, protocol. "
                           "Sourced from FalsifyLab daily aggregator.",
            "inputSchema": {
                "type": "object",
                "properties": {
                    "limit": {"type": "integer", "default": 10,
                               "description": "max results (1-50)"},
                    "min_apy": {"type": "number", "default": 0,
                                 "description": "filter floor in pct"},
                    "asset": {"type": "string",
                               "description": "filter by asset symbol (BTC, ETH, SOL, etc.)"},
                },
            },
        },
        {
            "name": "hl_vault_leaderboard",
            "description": "Hyperliquid vault leaderboard with NAV, 30d return, "
                           "max drawdown, follower count, composite score. "
                           "Real-time scrape of HL info API.",
            "inputSchema": {
                "type": "object",
                "properties": {
                    "limit": {"type": "integer", "default": 10},
                    "sort_by": {"type": "string",
                                  "enum": ["score", "tvl", "return_30d", "followers"],
                                  "default": "score"},
                },
            },
        },
        {
            "name": "insider_buy_clusters",
            "description": "Form 4 insider buy clusters (3+ insiders bought same "
                           "ticker in 24-48h). Bullish signal. Filtered to "
                           "open-market purchases (P code), excluding awards/gifts.",
            "inputSchema": {
                "type": "object",
                "properties": {
                    "window_hours": {"type": "integer", "default": 24},
                    "min_insiders": {"type": "integer", "default": 3},
                },
            },
        },
        {
            "name": "sec8k_material_today",
            "description": "Material SEC 8-K filings today filtered by item code: "
                           "2.02 (earnings), 5.02 (officer change), 2.01 (M&A), "
                           "3.02 (dilution), 4.02 (restatement), 3.01 (delisting).",
            "inputSchema": {
                "type": "object",
                "properties": {
                    "items": {"type": "array", "items": {"type": "string"},
                                "description": "item codes (e.g. ['2.02','5.02'])"},
                    "ticker": {"type": "string",
                                "description": "filter by ticker symbol"},
                },
            },
        },
        {
            "name": "macro_tape",
            "description": "Live US macro snapshot: SPX, NDX, RUT, VIX, UST 2y/10y, "
                           "DXY, GOLD, WTI, BTC, ETH. Last price + 1d/5d % change.",
            "inputSchema": {
                "type": "object",
                "properties": {
                    "symbols": {"type": "array", "items": {"type": "string"}},
                },
            },
        },
        {
            "name": "etf_flow_today",
            "description": "US-listed spot crypto ETF aggregate flows today. "
                           "BTC + ETH net flow, 5d streak, cumulative AUM. "
                           "Source: SoSoValue.",
            "inputSchema": {"type": "object", "properties": {}},
        },
        {
            "name": "active_airdrop_farms",
            "description": "Active airdrop / points-farming opportunities. "
                           "Detected from DefiLlama yield gaps (where reported "
                           "APY exceeds base+rewards = likely points program). "
                           "Includes realistic APY, TVL, capital required, "
                           "confidence score. Sourced from Suki defi_scanner.",
            "inputSchema": {
                "type": "object",
                "properties": {
                    "limit": {"type": "integer", "default": 10},
                    "min_apy": {"type": "number", "default": 0,
                                 "description": "filter floor pct (realistic APY)"},
                    "min_tvl_usd": {"type": "number", "default": 0,
                                      "description": "filter pools <X TVL"},
                    "chain": {"type": "string",
                                "description": "filter (ethereum, base, arbitrum, etc.)"},
                },
            },
        },
        {
            "name": "polymarket_whale_positions",
            "description": "Top Polymarket whale wallets and their current "
                           "active positions sized >$10k. Copy-trade reference.",
            "inputSchema": {
                "type": "object",
                "properties": {
                    "min_position_usd": {"type": "integer", "default": 10000},
                },
            },
        },
    ]
  • The call_tool dispatch function that routes the tool name 'active_airdrop_farms' to an API GET request to the '/api/airdrops' endpoint. The actual data-fetching/processing logic is delegated to the backend API via _api_get().
    def call_tool(name: str, args: dict) -> dict:
        if name == "top_yield_farms":
            return _api_get("/api/yield/top", args)
        if name == "hl_vault_leaderboard":
            return _api_get("/api/hl_vaults", args)
        if name == "insider_buy_clusters":
            return _api_get("/api/form4/clusters", args)
        if name == "sec8k_material_today":
            return _api_get("/api/sec8k/today", args)
        if name == "macro_tape":
            return _api_get("/api/macro", args)
        if name == "etf_flow_today":
            return _api_get("/api/etf_flow", args)
        if name == "active_airdrop_farms":
            return _api_get("/api/airdrops", args)
        if name == "polymarket_whale_positions":
            return _api_get("/api/polymarket/whales", args)
        return {"error": f"unknown tool: {name}"}
  • The _api_get() helper function that executes the HTTP GET request to the backend API. It constructs the URL, passes parameters, adds auth headers, and handles errors.
    def _api_get(path: str, params: dict | None = None) -> dict:
        if params:
            from urllib.parse import urlencode
            path = f"{path}?{urlencode(params)}"
        req = urllib.request.Request(
            f"{API_BASE}{path}",
            headers={
                "User-Agent": USER_AGENT,
                "Accept": "application/json",
                **({"Authorization": f"Bearer {API_KEY}"} if API_KEY else {}),
            },
        )
        try:
            with urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=20) as r:
                return json.loads(r.read())
        except urllib.error.HTTPError as e:
            body = e.read().decode(errors="ignore")[:400]
            return {"error": f"HTTP {e.code}: {body}"}
        except Exception as e:
            return {"error": str(e)[:200]}
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions detection from DefiLlama and included fields (APY, TVL, etc.), implying a read-only list operation. However, it does not specify update frequency, side effects, or rate limits, leaving some gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences with no wasted words. Each sentence adds value: purpose, detection method, and data source. It is front-loaded and appropriately sized for the tool's simplicity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and 4 parameters, the description sufficiently explains the tool's output fields (APY, TVL, capital, confidence) and source. It lacks details on ordering, pagination, or error handling, but for a list tool this is acceptable. A more complete description would include output structure.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 75% (3 of 4 params described). The description adds marginal value by mentioning derived fields like 'confidence score' but does not detail the 'limit' parameter or clarify parameter usage beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool provides 'Active airdrop / points-farming opportunities' and distinguishes from siblings like 'top_yield_farms' by focusing on airdrops. It specifies the detection method and data source, making the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use (for airdrop/points opportunities) but does not explicitly exclude alternatives or mention when not to use. It provides context for usage but lacks formal guidance compared to siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/FalsifyLab/falsifylab-alpha-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server