Skip to main content
Glama
FallseF

Fusion MCP Server

by FallseF

fusion_transform

Transform data between formats using fusion algorithms for enhanced analysis and processing with statistical, machine learning, or hybrid methods.

Instructions

Transform data using fusion techniques

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
inputYesInput data to transform
target_formatYesTarget format for transformation

Implementation Reference

  • Executes the fusion_transform tool: destructures input and target_format, simulates transformation by prefixing input with uppercase target_format in brackets, and returns formatted result as text content.
    async handleTransform(args) {
      const { input, target_format } = args;
    
      // Simulate transformation
      const result = {
        original: input,
        transformed: `[${target_format.toUpperCase()}] ${input}`,
        format: target_format,
        timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
      };
    
      return {
        content: [
          {
            type: "text",
            text: `Transformation complete:\n${JSON.stringify(result, null, 2)}`,
          },
        ],
      };
    }
  • Tool definition in listTools response: name, description, and input schema requiring 'input' (string) and 'target_format' (string).
    {
      name: "fusion_transform",
      description: "Transform data using fusion techniques",
      inputSchema: {
        type: "object",
        properties: {
          input: {
            type: "string",
            description: "Input data to transform",
          },
          target_format: {
            type: "string",
            description: "Target format for transformation",
          },
        },
        required: ["input", "target_format"],
      },
    },
  • src/index.js:82-89 (registration)
    Dispatch logic in CallToolRequestSchema handler: switch on tool name routes 'fusion_transform' to the handleTransform method.
    switch (name) {
      case "fusion_analyze":
        return await this.handleAnalyze(args);
      case "fusion_transform":
        return await this.handleTransform(args);
      default:
        throw new Error(`Unknown tool: ${name}`);
    }
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. However, it only states the action ('transform data') without any details on traits like side effects, permissions needed, rate limits, or what the transformation entails (e.g., destructive changes, format conversions). This leaves critical behavioral aspects unspecified for a tool that likely performs mutations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with no wasted words, making it appropriately concise. However, it lacks front-loading of critical details (e.g., purpose differentiation), which slightly reduces its effectiveness despite the brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity implied by 'fusion techniques' and the lack of annotations and output schema, the description is incomplete. It fails to explain what the tool does beyond a vague action, what 'fusion' means, or what the transformation output looks like, leaving significant gaps for the agent to understand and use the tool effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage, with clear documentation for both parameters ('input' and 'target_format'). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, such as examples of valid inputs or formats, but since the schema is comprehensive, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate as it doesn't detract from the existing information.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Transform data using fusion techniques' is vague and tautological—it essentially restates the tool name 'fusion_transform' without specifying what 'fusion techniques' entail or what kind of data transformation occurs. It does not distinguish this tool from its sibling 'fusion_analyze', leaving the agent unclear about the specific action (transform vs. analyze).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as its sibling 'fusion_analyze'. There is no mention of context, prerequisites, or exclusions, leaving the agent with no information to decide between tools or understand appropriate use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/FallseF/Fusion_MCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server