A
licenseNot graded
qualityF
maintenanceEnables generating, validating, planning, and applying Terraform configurations to manage infrastructure through natural language.
MIT
Facets Module MCP Server
by Facets-cloud
Related Servers
Alternatives to Facets Module MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityFmaintenanceEnables management of Terraform infrastructure as code through 25 comprehensive tools for operations including plan/apply/destroy, state management, workspace management, and configuration file editing.26MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceExposes Terraform/Terragrunt tooling as Claude Code tools for generating variables.tf and mock outputs automatically from input files.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Terraform HCL plan generation, drift detection, and strict human confirmation approval barriers for cloud infrastructure management.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenance🌍 Terraform Model Context Protocol (MCP) Tool - An experimental CLI tool that enables AI assistants to manage and operate Terraform environments. Supports reading Terraform configurations, analyzing plans, applying configurations, and managing state with Claude Desktop integration. ⚡️371MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query an approved Terraform module registry and generate compliant Azure infrastructure code. It provides tools for module discovery, scaffolding, and validation against organizational standards.MIT
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 30 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, especially the write_* family which is carefully partitioned by file type. A few clusters (output type queries, file-writing helpers) could cause initial confusion, but their descriptions resolve the boundaries.
Naming Consistency4/5
Naming is mostly consistent snake_case verb_noun: write_resource_file, list_all_intents, check_deployment_status, validate_module. A few odd exceptions like push_preview_module_to_facets_cp, test_already_previewed_module, and FIRST_STEP_get_instructions break the pattern.
Tool Count2/5
30 tools is above the 25+ threshold and feels heavy for an MCP surface. The scope is broad, but several write, list, and query helpers could likely be consolidated.
Completeness4/5
The module lifecycle is well covered: instructions, file read/write, generation, forking, validation, import, preview, publish, and test. Minor gaps like missing delete/update operations for intents and output types prevent a perfect score.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues