FIRST_STEP_get_api_script_guide

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the burden of explaining behavior. It states that the tool returns 'a JSON string containing the content of the API script guide,' which is the core expected behavior. It does not explicitly discuss side effects, but for a guide-loading tool, none are expected. This is more informative than a bare 'get guide' description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is highly concise and effectively front-loaded. It begins with a vital directive in a highlighted <important> tag, then gives a one-sentence purpose, and finishes with a clear return type. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (no parameters, returns a string), the description is fully complete. It specifies the return format and the mandatory first-call position in the workflow. The sibling tools are all different, and no additional context is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The input schema is empty and thus requires no additional explanation. The description appropriately focuses on the return value rather than parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool 'Loads the API script generation guide' and explains what the guide contains (comprehensive instructions for creating scripts that interact with Control Plane APIs). The verb 'loads' and specific resource make it distinct from sibling tools that search or call APIs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly instructs the agent to 'ALWAYS Call this tool first before calling any other tool of this mcp.' This strong, unambiguous usage guidance leaves no doubt about when and how to use the tool in the workflow.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.