ruyi_list_console_messages

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

无任何注解，描述需承担全部行为说明责任。但描述仅说明'读取'和'筛选'，未提及是否返回历史全部消息、分页行为、是否有副作用或是否需要特定页面上下文。这些信息对安全调用至关重要，描述未覆盖。

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

描述仅有两句话，直接传达核心功能与筛选能力，没有冗余内容，信息密度高。

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

没有输出schema，描述未说明返回格式或消息内容，但参数schema完整。缺少使用场景、返回值说明以及与其他日志工具的关系，对于简单列表工具尚可，但仍有明显提升空间。

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

输入schema覆盖100%，每个参数均有描述。描述中的'按类型筛选'与types参数对应，但未额外补充参数语义或格式，因此达到schema覆盖下的基线3分。

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

描述使用具体动词'读取'和资源'浏览器控制台日志消息'，清晰说明工具功能。虽然未显式与兄弟工具如ruyi_get_websocket_messages、ruyi_list_network_requests进行区分，但资源本身具有特异性，足以与其他工具识别。

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

没有说明何时使用此工具而非其他日志相关工具，也没有提供排除条件或备选方案。仅提及'支持按类型筛选'，但未涉及使用场景或前置条件，缺乏选择指导。

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.