A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceA Model Context Protocol server providing comprehensive task management capabilities with support for project organization, task tracking, and automatic PRD parsing into actionable items.
38
MIT
WeWork MCP Server
by FOX2920
Related Servers
Alternatives to WeWork MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to interact with Feishu project management systems, allowing retrieval of project views and work items.612MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables Large Language Models to interact with ClickUp workspace tasks and data, allowing creation and retrieval of tasks through natural language.19197 npm6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA unified Model Context Protocol server that provides a consistent interface for AI assistants to interact with productivity tools like Linear, GitHub, Slack, and Notion. It enables users to search, retrieve, and manage tasks and data across multiple workplace services from a single endpoint.23 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server providing AI assistants with comprehensive project, task, and subtask management capabilities with project-specific storage.2941 npm88MIT
PostHog MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables Claude Desktop users to interact directly with PostHog, allowing them to view projects and create annotations through natural language commands.10MIT
TDQS
B3.2/5.0
Scored across 6 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have distinct purposes: analyze_project_tasks focuses on task analysis, find_project_by_name and search_projects handle project discovery (though these two could be confused), get_project_details and get_project_statistics provide different project information, and test_connection is clearly separate. The main ambiguity is between find_project_by_name and search_projects, which both search projects by name with slightly different approaches.
Naming Consistency4/5
Tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with clear verb_noun structure (analyze_project_tasks, find_project_by_name, get_project_details, etc.). The only minor deviation is test_connection, which uses a simpler verb_noun pattern but still fits the overall naming convention.
Tool Count5/5
With 6 tools, this is well-scoped for a project management server focused on WeWork. The count is appropriate as it covers core operations (project discovery, details, statistics, task analysis) without being overwhelming or too sparse for the domain.
Completeness3/5
The toolset covers project discovery and analysis well but has notable gaps in project lifecycle management. There are no tools for creating, updating, or deleting projects or tasks, which limits agents to read-only operations. However, for analysis and monitoring purposes, the existing tools provide reasonable coverage.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues