Skip to main content
Glama
F-e-u-e-r

tradingview-mcp-review

by F-e-u-e-r
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to tradingview-mcp-review

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • TradingView MCP Jackson

      Big-Tea-Rice
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for controlling TradingView Desktop via CDP, enabling chart navigation, Pine Script development, replay trading, and a morning brief workflow with customizable rules.
      132 npm
      -

    • tradingview-mcp

      harshil1502
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A type-safe MCP server that enables AI agents to control TradingView Desktop via Chrome DevTools Protocol, allowing chart state reading, symbol/timeframe changes, and OHLCV data fetching.
      11
      132 npm
      1
      MIT

    • tradinview-mcp

      Ham12-3
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A TradingView-style market research and charting MCP server that provides tools for market data, indicators, watchlists, and local HTML chart rendering without scraping TradingView.
      9
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action: health check, state retrieval, setting symbol/timeframe/visible range, getting OHLCV data, and screenshots. No functional overlap.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming mixes prefixes: 'tv_' for health check, 'chart_' for state and settings, 'data_' for OHLCV, and no prefix for screenshot. While still readable, the pattern is inconsistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools are well-scoped for chart review and navigation, fitting the recommended 3-15 range. Each tool serves a clear purpose without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    Core trade review workflows are covered (navigate to date, get historical OHLCV, capture screenshot). A minor gap is the absence of a tool to change chart type (e.g., candlestick to line), which could be useful but is not critical.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources