get_device_status

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses this is a read operation ('get current status') and lists device types. However, no annotations exist, and the description does not mention potential side effects, authentication needs, rate limits, or behavior when no devices are present. It is minimally adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with no extraneous information. It is perfectly concise for the tool's simplicity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no parameters and the existence of an output schema (per context signals), the description sufficiently conveys the tool's purpose and scope. It is complete for a read-only status retrieval tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters. The description adds meaning beyond the empty schema by specifying what is retrieved (status of all listed device types), achieving baseline 4 for parameterless tools.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Get) and the resource (current status of all SmartRent devices), listing specific device types (locks, thermostat, switches, sensors). It distinguishes itself from siblings like lock_door (specific device) or set_temperature (specific action).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for checking overall device status but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., for a general overview vs. controlling a specific device). No when-not or alternative guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.