Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to EyeBrowse

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to automate a privacy-focused Firefox-based browser through MCP, with session and profile management, navigation, interaction, extraction, screenshots, JavaScript execution, tabs, downloads, and permission/URL validation.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Exposes a 47-tool browser automation surface to MCP clients, enabling AI agents to navigate, interact with, observe, and extract content from web pages across multi-tab sessions. Runs on Camoufox-based anti-detection behavior so agents can automate sites that block conventional headless browsers, with session persistence, cookie import, and stdio or HTTP transport.
      549 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI agents to navigate, interact with, and automate the web through an anti-detection browser toolset, supporting multi-tab workflows, session persistence, downloads, extraction, and token-efficient accessibility snapshots.
      549 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Gives MCP-compatible AI agents an anti-detection browser toolset for navigating, interacting with, searching, and extracting content from websites, plus downloads, multi-tab workflows, and persistent sessions with cookies and saved profiles. It enables reliable automation of the web without getting blocked by running against a separate Camoufox-based browser server.
      549 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 84 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there are overlapping sets like multiple click methods (browser_click, browser_cdp_click, browser_mouse_click) and type methods (browser_type, browser_type_otp, browser_set_input). Descriptions help differentiate, but some ambiguity remains.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'browser_verb_noun' snake_case pattern. The naming is predictable and well-structured, with no mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 84 tools, the server is overly large for its scope. While browser automation is broad, this many tools risk overwhelming agents and could benefit from consolidation.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers nearly every aspect of browser automation: navigation, clicks, typing, forms, storage, network, screenshots, PDF, permissions, captchas, TOTP, and more. There are no obvious gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues