Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to everypage-mcp

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server that lets AI assistants read and visually analyze local documents — PDFs, Excel spreadsheets, CSV files, Word documents, PowerPoint presentations, and images.
    4
    42 npm
    72 PyPI
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server that enables AI assistants to read, search, and analyze PDF files from local paths or URLs. It provides tools for extracting specific page ranges, searching for terms, and retrieving document metadata.
    4
    20 npm
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A local-first MCP server that ingests PDFs, extracts structure, and provides semantic search and sequential navigation tools for AI clients to query and learn from documents.
    10
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    An MCP server that provides AI-powered document processing and search capabilities, including PDF summarization, text extraction, metadata retrieval, and web search via Google Custom Search.
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server for AiDocX, enabling AI assistants to create, upload, manage, and analyze business documents and presentation decks, with support for various document types and AI-powered generation.
    51 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server that converts PDFs to Markdown, reconstructing hidden hyperlinks and extracting images in reading order for AI agents.
    MIT

TDQS

A4.3/5.0

Scored across 15 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: documents, variants, readership/events, webhooks, and account info are cleanly separated. Even similar-sounding pairs like update_file_settings vs replace_content or update_variant vs delete_variant are clearly differentiated by their descriptions.

Naming Consistency4/5

Almost all tools follow the everypage_verb_noun pattern, e.g. list_files, share_pdf, update_file_settings, create_variants. The exceptions are the noun-only everypage_account and the broad everypage_manage_webhook, which is less action-specific than the other lifecycle verbs.

Tool Count5/5

15 tools is at the top of the well-scoped range, and each tool earns its place by covering a distinct feature area: document management, sharing settings, per-recipient variants, analytics, webhooks, and account info. No tool feels redundant or excessive for this platform's purpose.

Completeness4/5

The server covers CRUD for documents and variants, readership analytics, event monitoring, webhooks, and account/plan checks. Minor gaps are the lack of an explicit webhook update operation and the inability to restore trashed documents from the MCP server, which requires the dashboard.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues