models_products
List product types available in the AetherEdge system for Modbus, CAN, or J1939 device configurations.
Instructions
List available product types
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List product types available in the AetherEdge system for Modbus, CAN, or J1939 device configurations.
List available product types
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It only says 'List available product types', omitting any behavioral traits like authentication needs, rate limits, or result characteristics.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, no wasted words. It is appropriately sized for a simple tool, though could slightly expand on result details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a zero-parameter, no-output-schema tool, the description is adequate but minimal. It lacks details on pagination, sorting, or what constitutes a product type.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, and schema description coverage is 100%. The description adds no parameter info, which is acceptable given zero parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'List available product types' clearly states the action and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like alarms_list or rules_list by focusing on product types, but does not explicitly differentiate.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as models_instances or other list tools. The description does not mention context or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/EvanL1/AetherEdge'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server