Extract profit from spot grid

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true, readOnlyHint=false, and idempotentHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds essentially no behavioral context beyond the annotations: it does not say whether the grid keeps running after extraction, whether repeated calls extract again, or where the funds go. 'Weight: 1' is the only extra operational detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very short and front-loaded, with the key action first. The opening line repeats the title verbatim, which is minor waste, and 'Weight: 1' is a useful trailing detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter tool with no output schema, the description is minimally adequate but leaves notable gaps: the effect on the still-running grid, the destination of the extracted profit, and whether the amount must not exceed accumulated profit are all unstated.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and both parameters (amount, buOrderId) are documented in the schema, so the baseline of 3 applies. The description adds no meaning beyond the schema, e.g., whether 'amount' is capped by accumulated profit or has a minimum.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('extract') and resource ('accumulated grid profit') scoped to a running spot grid order, which distinguishes it from sibling read tools like pionex_bot_get_spot_grid_order. It is clear but does not explicitly contrast itself against the many sibling bot tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'from a running spot grid order' implies a precondition, but there is no explicit when-to-use guidance, no mention of alternatives (e.g., cancel vs. adjust vs. profit extraction), and no stated prerequisites such as available profit balance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.