Browser-MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Browser-MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA browser automation MCP server providing 30 tools for navigation, interaction, page information, state checks, tab management, and more, enabling natural language control of browsers via MCP-compatible clients.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI-powered browser automation, web scraping, and testing using Playwright across Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit. It allows users to perform actions like navigation, clicking, typing, and taking screenshots through natural language interfaces.17 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Selenium-based MCP server that exposes browser automation tools for navigation, interaction, form filling, and assertions, enabling AI agents to control web browsers through natural language.GPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA FastMCP server that enables browser automation through natural language commands, allowing Language Models to browse the web, fill out forms, click buttons, and perform other web-based tasks via a simple API.5MIT
- AlicenseBqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA MCP server that provides browser automation tools, allowing users to navigate websites, take screenshots, click elements, fill forms, and execute JavaScript through Playwright.82Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables plain-English browser automation via an MCP server, allowing agents to run objectives or test suites in a real browser without selectors or scripts.96 npm3Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 35 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap that could cause confusion. For example, 'click_element' and 'click_element_by_xpath' serve similar functions with different targeting methods, and 'get_element_info' and 'get_page_state' both retrieve element details, potentially leading to misselection. However, descriptions generally clarify differences, preventing major ambiguity.
Tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern throughout, with clear verb_noun structures like 'create_chrome_instance' and 'navigate_to'. Minor deviations exist, such as 'browser_tips' being more descriptive than action-oriented, but overall naming is predictable and readable across the set.
With 35 tools, the count is excessive for a browser automation server, making it feel heavy and potentially overwhelming. While the domain is broad, many tools could be consolidated or omitted without losing functionality, indicating poor scoping and an over-engineered surface that may hinder agent usability.
The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for browser automation, including instance management, navigation, interaction, content extraction, and utilities like downloads and screenshots. It supports full CRUD-like operations for browser sessions and tabs, with no obvious gaps that would cause agent failures in typical web automation tasks.