search_entry_jobs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It mentions 'search and rank', which suggests sorting but no details on pagination, sorting criteria, or non-destructive nature. The behavior is moderately transparent but lacks specifics.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise but lacks structure. There is no breakdown of parameters or clear organization. Though brief, it could be more informative without being lengthy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 7 parameters (including nested objects), no schema descriptions, and no output schema, the description is severely incomplete. It fails to explain essential parameters like the required keywords or the complex student_profile object, making it insufficient for an agent to correctly invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must explain parameters. It only hints at 'intern, newcomer, entry-level' relating to employment_type, but fails to describe other key parameters like keywords, limit, location, job_category, student_profile, or deadline_within_days. This leaves the agent with minimal guidance on how to use the parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool 'searches and ranks' jobs, specifying the target audience and job types (intern, newcomer, entry-level). This differentiates it from siblings like get_job_detail (which retrieves a single job's details) and make_application_brief (which handles applications).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies it is for student-friendly job searches but does not explicitly state when to use it over alternatives or exclude scenarios. No guidance on when not to use it or prerequisites is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.