delete_saved_vibe

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It merely states the action without revealing whether deletion is permanent, irreversible, or what happens if the named vibe does not exist. For a destructive operation, this is a notable gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no wasted words, and the central verb 'Delete' is front-loaded. Every word contributes to the core purpose, making it highly efficient for an agent to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple one-parameter schema and no output schema, the description covers the basic action and parameter. However, it omits important contextual cues for a destructive tool, such as irreversibility or failure behavior. The absence of annotations makes this omission more significant, though the simplicity keeps it from being severely incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the schema already explains that 'name' refers to the saved vibe to delete. The description adds only the phrase 'by name', which does not provide meaningful semantics beyond the schema, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear action ('Delete') and a specific resource ('previously saved vibe'), with the method of identification ('by name'). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like save_vibe, apply_saved_vibe, and list_saved_vibes by targeting removal rather than creation, application, or listing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when a previously saved vibe should be removed, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives or mention prerequisites such as listing saved vibes to confirm names. There are no exclusions or direct references to sibling tools, leaving the routing decision to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.