A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceEnables Claude Desktop to interact with Aras Innovator PLM systems via OAuth 2.0, allowing users to query PLM data, create items, and call server methods through natural language.
16
MIT
aras-plm-mcp
by Erryb95
Related Servers
Alternatives to aras-plm-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceIntegrates with Teamcenter PLM using its REST API, enabling search, create, update, and query of Teamcenter items through natural language.3ISC
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceIntegrates PTC Windchill and Creo Parametric with LLM-based clients via the Model Context Protocol, enabling natural language interaction with PLM and CAD systems for tasks like part search, BOM retrieval, model operations, and exports.114MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables managing workspace products, inventory, orders, manufacturing, and traceability through natural language in AI assistants like ChatGPT, Codex, and Claude.5 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM), including DOORS Next Generation, EWM, and ETM, for managing requirements, work items, tests, and project builds through natural language.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to connect to an industrial BI platform and read or build manufacturing dashboards, OEE reports, schedules, spreadsheets, forms, calendar events, and 3D CAD parts through natural-language tools.MIT
TDQS
B3.3/5.0
Scored across 71 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools are clearly scoped to a specific resource and action, and the descriptions are rich enough to separate queries, lifecycle, workflow, BOM, and admin operations. However, a few pairs are genuinely confusable—aras_promote_item vs aras_release_item and aras_create_item vs aras_create_part/aras_create_document—so it is not a perfect 5.
Naming Consistency4/5
The aras_ prefix plus a verb_noun structure is used consistently across nearly all tools, with clear clusters like get_*, list_*, create_*, and manage_*. A handful of nonstandard names such as aras_how_to, aras_where_used, aras_bulk_update, and bare verbs like aras_search or aras_ping keep it from being fully consistent.
Tool Count1/5
71 tools is far beyond the 50+ extreme threshold and dramatically more than the recommended agent-facing surface. Even for a broad PLM domain, this many entry points creates a heavy selection burden, and many niche administrative tools could be consolidated or exposed behind a smaller number of parameterized tools.
Completeness4/5
The surface is exceptionally comprehensive: item CRUD, revisions, lifecycle, workflow, BOM, change management, documents/files, permissions, admin, reporting, and AML are all covered. Minor gaps remain, such as no direct file upload path, no generic relationship delete/update tool, and aras_run_query being a known-limited fallback, but these are documented and usually workaroundable.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues