Skip to main content
Glama
EricSeokgon

egovframe-scaffold-mcp

by EricSeokgon

create_egovframe_project

Generates a new eGovFrame project skeleton from official templates, applying specified project name, groupId, and database type. Supports dry-run preview.

Instructions

전자정부 표준프레임워크 공식 템플릿으로 새 프로젝트 골격을 생성합니다. 공식 GitHub 템플릿을 내려받아 projectName/groupId/DB 타입을 적용합니다. dryRun=true로 먼저 미리보기할 수 있습니다.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
refNo내려받을 브랜치/태그(미지정 시 템플릿 기본 브랜치). 예: main, v4.3.0
dryRunNotrue면 디스크에 쓰지 않고 생성 예정 내용만 미리보기
groupIdYes자바 groupId. 예: egovframework.example
databaseNoDB 타입 (템플릿 지원: hsql|mysql|oracle|altibase|tibero)hsql
templateNo템플릿 종류simple-backend
outputDirYes프로젝트를 생성할 상위 디렉터리(절대경로 권장)
projectNameYes프로젝트명(artifactId). 소문자·숫자·하이픈, 예: my-egov-app
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description notes dryRun for preview but lacks details on potential destructive behavior (e.g., overwriting existing directories), required permissions, or error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, front-loaded with purpose, no unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Briefly covers purpose and a key flag (dryRun) but omits output/return value description (no output schema). Given 7 parameters, schema already details them; additional behavioral or success criteria would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%; description adds minimal extra context beyond schema (e.g., 'official GitHub template'). DryRun hint already present in schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it creates a new project skeleton from official eGovFrame template with specified settings. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like add_egovframe_components or validate_egovframe_project.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Only mentions using dryRun=true for preview. No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/EricSeokgon/egovframe-scaffold-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server