GauntletCI-MCP
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| analyze_commitA | Run GauntletCI behavioral change risk analysis on the current HEAD commit in a .NET repository. Returns findings as structured text. |
| get_findings_jsonC | Run GauntletCI and return the raw JSON result for programmatic processing. |
| get_sarifA | Run GauntletCI and return a SARIF 2.1.0 report. Useful for feeding into tools that consume SARIF (GitHub Advanced Security, VS Code SARIF viewer, etc.). |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools all trigger the same GauntletCI analysis but return different outputs (structured text, JSON, SARIF). The descriptions clearly differentiate the output formats, making it easy for an agent to choose based on the desired result.
Naming is inconsistent: 'analyze_commit' uses a verb_noun pattern while 'get_findings_json' and 'get_sarif' use 'get_'. This mixed convention could cause confusion about the action of each tool.
Three tools is a lean but appropriate set for a focused CI analysis server. Each output format covers a distinct use case without unnecessary bloat.
The tool surface is incomplete: it only analyzes the current HEAD commit and lacks options for specifying a different commit, configuring analysis parameters, or retrieving previous analyses. This leaves significant gaps for users needing more control.