Skip to main content
Glama
workana-mcp

workana-mcp

by ErgoCodes

Related Servers

Alternatives to workana-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search and read public Karlancer marketplace data, including freelance projects, freelancer profiles, fixed-price services, skills, categories, and market-rate insights. It is read-only and requires no API key or account.
      14
      195 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to read and query a daily job-scan dataset via four read-only tools, including searching job postings, viewing the latest report, and checking market statistics.
      4
      51 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables any MCP host to search topstartups.io job postings by keyword, location, remote preference, and date, and to fetch individual job details through read-only tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to discover public tasks and bounties, search the feed, fetch task details, and retrieve registration guidance through read-only remote MCP and A2A endpoints without authentication.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to search open projects, freelancers and Offers, read briefs and profiles with recent reviews, and check median budgets, notifications and WorkStreams using cookies from your own Chrome session. Also lets users maintain a project watchlist and saved searches with email alerts, without sending proposals, messages, or spending credits.
      2
      17
      114 PyPI
      6
      Elastic 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The four tools operate at distinct scopes: listing search, single-project detail, deep evaluation, and a batch daily workflow. However, three of them emit a 0-100 opportunity score (buscar, evaluar, mejores_oportunidades), which risks confusion about which to use, though the descriptions cross-reference each other to clarify.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the workana_ prefix and use Spanish naming, and three follow a verb_noun pattern (buscar_proyectos, ver_proyecto, evaluar_proyecto). The fourth, mejores_oportunidades, breaks the verb pattern with a noun phrase, a minor deviation.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is on the lean side but each has a clear role in the search/evaluate pipeline. Nothing feels redundant enough to remove, though the surface is slightly thin for a job-hunting workflow.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers discovery and evaluation well, but there is no tool to actually submit a proposal or save/bookmark projects, despite the tools repeatedly referencing 'postularse' (applying). This is a notable gap in the lifecycle.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues