Skip to main content
Glama
ErgoCodes

workana-mcp

by ErgoCodes

Related Servers

Alternatives to workana-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to read and query a daily job-scan dataset via four read-only tools, including searching job postings, viewing the latest report, and checking market statistics.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables any MCP host to search topstartups.io job postings by keyword, location, remote preference, and date, and to fetch individual job details through read-only tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables any MCP host to search job listings and retrieve individual job details from a public job board's API/RSS through standardized tools. It provides read-only search and detail lookup with polite rate limiting and remote/location filtering.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search a shared catalog of projects, roles, orders, participants, and mentors, create and update listings or profiles, draft proposals, and search and apply across external freelance and job platforms while keeping platform credentials local.
      13
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to search and retrieve public job listings from web3.career through the search_jobs and get_job tools, with keyword, location, remote, date, and limit filters. It is read-only, returns structured job details such as title, company, location, and apply URL, and works with any MCP host.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables recruiters and account managers to search public candidate profiles, match role briefs to ranked shortlists, browse categories, retrieve profile links, and draft value-first pitches while avoiding private data and outbound messages.
      6
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The four tools operate at distinct scopes: listing search, single-project detail, deep evaluation, and a batch daily workflow. However, three of them emit a 0-100 opportunity score (buscar, evaluar, mejores_oportunidades), which risks confusion about which to use, though the descriptions cross-reference each other to clarify.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the workana_ prefix and use Spanish naming, and three follow a verb_noun pattern (buscar_proyectos, ver_proyecto, evaluar_proyecto). The fourth, mejores_oportunidades, breaks the verb pattern with a noun phrase, a minor deviation.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is on the lean side but each has a clear role in the search/evaluate pipeline. Nothing feels redundant enough to remove, though the surface is slightly thin for a job-hunting workflow.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers discovery and evaluation well, but there is no tool to actually submit a proposal or save/bookmark projects, despite the tools repeatedly referencing 'postularse' (applying). This is a notable gap in the lifecycle.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues