ecp-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to ecp-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for managing cPanel hosting accounts via UAPI. Enables domains, DNS, email, MySQL, file management, and arbitrary UAPI calls through natural language.1634 npmMIT

panelica-mcpofficial
AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceEnables natural language interaction with a Panelica hosting panel to manage domains, SSL, databases, services, and more through any MCP client.404241 npm2MIT
agenthost MCP serverofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAgent-first web hosting driven entirely through a remote MCP server, enabling full hosting management via natural language with OAuth or token authentication.-- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceConnect any MCP-compatible AI agent to the full Hostinger platform. Manage VPS, domains, DNS, hosting, WordPress, email, ecommerce, and more through natural language.1000MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA complete MCP server enabling AI assistants to manage cPanel hosting through natural language, including file, database, email, subdomain, and system operations.161MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server for managing cPanel hosting accounts through AI assistants. It supports DNS, email (DKIM/SPF), databases, domains, SSL, PHP, cron jobs, security, Git deployment, and more.10026ISC
TDQS
Scored across 194 tools
Most tools are clearly distinct by resource area and action, and the descriptions carefully call out subtle differences (e.g. ecp_apps_directory_tree vs ecp_files_directory_tree, ecp_ssl_request vs ecp_ssl_update vs ecp_ssl_apply). A few near-duplicates exist—ecp_files_copy vs ecp_files_copy_multiple and ecp_files_move vs ecp_files_move_multiple—but they are rare and understandable.
The ecp_<area>_<verb>_<noun> pattern is followed almost everywhere, making names very predictable. Minor deviations include ecp_network_port_maps (noun-first), ecp_network_domain_port_maps, and ecp_files_is_directory_exists (awkward verb phrase), but these do not undermine the overall uniformity.
194 tools is an extreme count for a single MCP server. Even accounting for the broad hosting-panel domain (files, four database engines, SSL, nginx, git, supervisor, cron, notifications, backups), this volume creates a massive selection surface and will overwhelm agents. The count alone warrants the lowest score.
The tool surface is remarkably comprehensive: apps, domains, DNS, nginx, files, four database engines with user/privilege/backup/restore operations, SSL, supervisor, crontab, asdf, git webhooks, notifications, and storage. The only notable gap is the explicitly blocked ability to run custom commands directly (ecp_apps_save_custom_command mentions 'run' isn't exposed yet), which is a stated intentional limitation rather than an oversight.