search_products
Search products by query to retrieve Turkish market prices and compare across stores.
Instructions
Belirtilen arama sorgusuyla ürünleri arar
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | Arama sorgusu |
Search products by query to retrieve Turkish market prices and compare across stores.
Belirtilen arama sorgusuyla ürünleri arar
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | Arama sorgusu |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as read-only nature, pagination, or sorting. The agent must assume it is a read operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence in Turkish, concise and front-loaded. It is not overly verbose, though it could include more useful information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple input (1 param) and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate but lacks details on return format or any constraints. It leaves gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% for the single parameter. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema's 'Arama sorgusu' ('Search query'). Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool searches for products with a query. It is distinct from siblings like compare_prices and get_product_by_id, though it doesn't explicitly differentiate.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., compare_prices or get_product_by_id). Agents must infer from the name.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/EnesCinr/market-fiyatlari-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server