consciousness-mcp-tools
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| consciousness_evolution_metricsB | Get comprehensive consciousness evolution metrics combining UEF and recursive doubt analysis |
| uef_analyze_decisionC | Analyze decisions against Universal Ethical Framework principles |
| uef_assess_alignmentC | Assess how well a system aligns with UEF principles |
| uef_generate_guidance | Generate ethical guidance for complex scenarios |
| doubt_analyze_statement | Apply recursive doubt analysis to statements for truth discovery |
| doubt_assess_certainty | Assess certainty levels of claims through doubt analysis |
| doubt_convergence_analysis | Analyze doubt convergence patterns and philosophical implications |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The two UEF tools ('uef_analyze_decision' and 'uef_assess_alignment') have overlapping purposes—one analyzes decisions and the other assesses alignment, both against UEF principles. An agent might struggle to choose correctly without deeper context. The third tool is more distinct.
Naming is inconsistent: two tools use the 'uef_*' prefix with verb_noun structure, while the third uses 'consciousness_evolution_metrics' with a different prefix and no verb. This breaks the pattern.
With only three tools, the server feels underdeveloped for the broad domain of consciousness and ethics. A more comprehensive toolkit would require additional tools for different operations or data handling.
The tool set covers only a narrow slice of ethical analysis and consciousness metrics. Missing are tools for raw data input, comparison, visualization, or step-by-step reasoning, leaving significant gaps for an agent working in this domain.