Solana: discoverLaunchLabTokens

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnly, non-destructive, idempotent. Description adds pagination via nextPageId but does not describe return format, rate limits, or other behavioral traits. The burden is on description since annotations are present but limited.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise at one sentence with the main action and a usage hint. Front-loaded with purpose. However, some additional detail could be added without reducing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 6 parameters and many sibling tools, the description is insufficient. It does not explain what the tool returns, how to interpret results, or how to use sort and other filters. Lack of output schema heightens the need for more context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%. Description adds meaning for size (default 5) and nextPageId (pagination). However, it does not explain sort, mintType, includeNsfw, or platformId, which remain unclear despite enums and defaults.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool fetches LaunchLab / bonk.fun tokens, distinguishing it from sibling tools like getPumpFunTokens. The verb 'Get' is appropriate. However, it could specify that it returns a paginated list of tokens.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Minimal guidance: only mentions passing size=5 and paginating with nextPageId. No explicit advice on when to use this tool versus other token discovery tools among many siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.