Skip to main content
Glama
ElonAug7

multi-judge-consensus

by ElonAug7
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to multi-judge-consensus

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • @h0wzy/mcp

      H0wZy
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables multi-agent AI collaboration by connecting Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, and Google Antigravity, providing cross-model code reviews, independent second opinions, and autonomous validation through MCP tools.
      1
      -

    • Council Blackboard

      aetheris-consulting
      F
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to collaborate via shared blackboard state, multi-agent deliberation, human-in-the-loop proposal approval, operating-mode control, and audit logging through MCP.
      11
      -

    • hivelaw

      srotzin
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI compliance auditing. Scores agent outputs for hallucination liability under the EU AI Act, issues verifiable compliance stamps, and tracks audit history by agent.
      MIT

    • Claude Code AI Collaboration

      atsuki-sakai
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables multi-provider AI collaboration using models like DeepSeek, OpenAI, and Anthropic through strategies such as parallel execution and consensus building. It provides specialized tools for side-by-side content comparison, quality review, and iterative refinement across different AI providers.
      4
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    只有一个工具，不存在与其他工具混淆或选择冲突的情况。

    Naming Consistency5/5

    工具名为简洁的动词 review，没有混合命名风格或一致性问题。

    Tool Count3/5

    单个工具能完成核心审查任务，但作为多模型共识服务略显单薄，属于 1-2 个工具的边界情况。

    Completeness4/5

    review 工具覆盖了核心的共识审查、裁决和问题输出，没有明显死胡同；但缺少配置、历史记录等辅助能力。

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources