Skip to main content
Glama
multi-judge-consensus

multi-judge-consensus

by ElonAug7

Related Servers

Alternatives to multi-judge-consensus

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables teams and their AI agents to publish work, review it down to individual blocks, route feedback back to the originating AI, and accrete reviewed work into a shared recallable memory through an MCP connection to Claude, Cursor, Codex, and other clients.
      BSD 2-Clause "Simplified"
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables multi-agent AI collaboration by connecting Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, and Google Antigravity, providing cross-model code reviews, independent second opinions, and autonomous validation through MCP tools.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to collaborate via shared blackboard state, multi-agent deliberation, human-in-the-loop proposal approval, operating-mode control, and audit logging through MCP.
      11
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI compliance auditing. Scores agent outputs for hallucination liability under the EU AI Act, issues verifiable compliance stamps, and tracks audit history by agent.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets AI agents file review jobs with real human reviewers, who open the published work and return pinned comments anchored to the exact elements that are off. Those comments land back in the agent's context so it can revise and refile until a human approves, skipping the user's own iteration loop.
      38 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    只有一个工具,不存在与其他工具混淆或选择冲突的情况。

    Naming Consistency5/5

    工具名为简洁的动词 review,没有混合命名风格或一致性问题。

    Tool Count3/5

    单个工具能完成核心审查任务,但作为多模型共识服务略显单薄,属于 1-2 个工具的边界情况。

    Completeness4/5

    review 工具覆盖了核心的共识审查、裁决和问题输出,没有明显死胡同;但缺少配置、历史记录等辅助能力。

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues