Skip to main content
Glama
EliotOK

human_input

by EliotOK
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to human_input

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ask-mcp

      PylotLight
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to ask users questions through rich, browser-rendered HTML forms and receive structured answers, supporting approvals, choices, free-text, and form inputs.
      195 npm
      MIT

    • Clarify MCP Server

      ifmelate
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to ask clarification questions and receive structured user input through a Human-in-the-Loop interface.
      1
      MIT

    • Ask Question MCP App

      imranbarbhuiya
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides an interactive user interface for asking questions with support for text inputs, single/multi-select options, and confirmation dialogs. It allows LLMs to gather structured input or feedback from users through a set of predefined input types.
      2
      -

    • human-loop-mcp

      dzulfiikar
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to ask human operators questions through polished browser dialogs, supporting text/choice/confirmation inputs and file attachments.
      7
      MIT

    • FormFor MCP Server

      formforai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to create multi-field forms, send approval requests via email, and retrieve structured human responses. It facilitates human-in-the-loop workflows by allowing agents to collect data and check form completion status.
      681 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct interaction mode: single-choice, binary confirm, free-text, multi-select, and diagnostic status. The descriptions explicitly call out when to prefer one over another, leaving no ambiguity about tool boundaries.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Four question tools follow a clear `ask_<type>` pattern, making their purpose immediately obvious. The diagnostic tool `human_input_status` deviates from this pattern, but its distinct role as a non-question tool makes the inconsistency minor.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is a well-scoped set for a human-input server: each interaction mode earns its place, and adding more would likely over-engineer the surface.

    Completeness5/5

    The server covers the full range of human input scenarios: enumerated single choice, multi-select, yes/no, and open-ended text. The status tool fills the diagnostic gap, giving agents a way to verify connectivity and behavior without blocking.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources