Skip to main content
Glama
Ardour Ultra MCP
by Elias02345

start_recording

Starts session recording and requests a transport roll in Ardour, so arm your tracks first before capturing takes.

Instructions

Enable session recording and request roll; arm tracks first.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "request": "<request>"
    },
    "name": "start_recording"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
requestYes

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataNo
errorNo
successNo
warningsNo
revision_afterNo
changed_objectsNo
revision_beforeNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare this as a non-read-only, non-destructive, non-idempotent write operation. The description adds the useful behavioral prerequisite to arm tracks first. It does not explain what "request roll" does, whether recording starts immediately, or how the seemingly generic dry_run and confirm_delete request fields apply.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded sentence with no filler. The jargon "request roll" slightly reduces clarity, but there is no structural waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a write tool with a complex request envelope and no schema description coverage, the definition leaves key details unexplained. It covers one prerequisite but omits what the request fields mean, whether confirmation is required, and how expected_revision applies. The existence of an output schema reduces the need to describe return values, but not the need to explain input and operation behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description should compensate, but it says nothing about the request object or its dry_run, confirm_delete, and expected_revision fields. The only parameter is a nested request envelope, and the description provides no mapping or meaning for those fields.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action: enabling session recording and requesting roll. It is readily distinguishable from the sibling stop_recording tool. However, the phrase "request roll" is jargon that may not be clear to an agent without domain knowledge.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives one important prerequisite: arm tracks first. It does not state when not to use this tool or name an alternative beyond the obvious stop_recording sibling. The guidance is implied rather than explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.