Skip to main content
Glama
Smart Quota Orchestrator

Smart Quota Orchestrator

by ElNeMeR70

Related Servers

Alternatives to Smart Quota Orchestrator

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents from any vendor to resume a task from the exact stopping point without model calls, re-reading old sessions, or re-exploring the code, by merging host hooks, agent checkpoints, and Git deltas into one compact brief. It also guards credits outside the model with a prompt clarity gate, a loop guard, and configurable token profiles.
      9
      36 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables autonomous AI coding agents to ground every code change in verified project facts and architecture contracts by searching an indexed knowledge base and having their implementation plans audited before execution. Includes tiered quota management with an emergency circuit breaker that blocks paid cloud API calls and falls back to local search to prevent runaway costs.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to compile polyglot repositories into architectural mipmap containers and use stateful pre-edit guardrails, fog-of-war resolution gating, blast-radius analysis, and compact Markdown packets to inspect code and prevent unsafe edits.
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables autonomous agents to enforce financial guardrails by tracking real-time token burn and cost velocity, automatically throttling or freezing execution when budgets are exceeded. It also blocks destructive shell commands, prompt injections, and runaway planning loops while sanitizing outputs before they are returned.
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 53 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The set has many overlapping clusters: sqo_pr_review, sqo_security_audit, sqo_council_review, and sqo_verify_work all perform diff/code audits; sqo_memory_vault, sqo_hive_mind, sqo_memory_graph, and sqo_memo_cache all store/retrieve memory; sqo_context_pack, sqo_repo_dna, sqo_compress_prompt, and sqo_prompt_xray all compress or package context. Some tools are genuinely distinct, but the boundaries between several categories are unclear enough that an agent could easily choose the wrong audit, memory, or compression tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Every tool uses the same sqo_ snake_case prefix, which makes the set easy to recognize and scan. However, the suffix pattern mixes noun phrases (sqo_dead_code, sqo_memory_vault, sqo_blast_radius) with verb-led names (sqo_compile_rules, sqo_verify_deps, sqo_edit_symbol), so it is mostly consistent rather than perfectly verb_noun throughout.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 53 tools, the surface is far beyond a well-scoped MCP set and is likely to overwhelm tool selection. Many tools are near-duplicates or subsumed by orchestrator tools like sqo_pr_review and sqo_autopilot, so the count is an extreme mismatch for the server's purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface broadly covers repo analysis, context compression, auditing, memory, planning, quota tracking, test generation, and symbol editing, so most workflows in the stated domain have a tool. There are minor gaps around general whole-file read/write/list operations and direct build/test execution, but agents can work around these with the symbol-editing and analysis tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues