Smart Quota Orchestrator
Related Servers
Alternatives to Smart Quota Orchestrator
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents from any vendor to resume a task from the exact stopping point without model calls, re-reading old sessions, or re-exploring the code, by merging host hooks, agent checkpoints, and Git deltas into one compact brief. It also guards credits outside the model with a prompt clarity gate, a loop guard, and configurable token profiles.936 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceZero-dependency token optimizer, test-failure triage gate, and System 1.5 semantic guardrail for AI coding agents. Intercepts compiler errors, missing dependencies, and doom loops in < 500µs.637 PyPI12MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to perform zero-token static audits, simulate refactorings in an ephemeral RAM clone, trace downstream ripple effects, and block unsafe writes with automatic rollback to prevent regressions.76 npmBusiness Source 1.1
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables autonomous AI coding agents to ground every code change in verified project facts and architecture contracts by searching an indexed knowledge base and having their implementation plans audited before execution. Includes tiered quota management with an emergency circuit breaker that blocks paid cloud API calls and falls back to local search to prevent runaway costs.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to compile polyglot repositories into architectural mipmap containers and use stateful pre-edit guardrails, fog-of-war resolution gating, blast-radius analysis, and compact Markdown packets to inspect code and prevent unsafe edits.2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables autonomous agents to enforce financial guardrails by tracking real-time token burn and cost velocity, automatically throttling or freezing execution when budgets are exceeded. It also blocks destructive shell commands, prompt injections, and runaway planning loops while sanitizing outputs before they are returned.7MIT
TDQS
Scored across 53 tools
The set has many overlapping clusters: sqo_pr_review, sqo_security_audit, sqo_council_review, and sqo_verify_work all perform diff/code audits; sqo_memory_vault, sqo_hive_mind, sqo_memory_graph, and sqo_memo_cache all store/retrieve memory; sqo_context_pack, sqo_repo_dna, sqo_compress_prompt, and sqo_prompt_xray all compress or package context. Some tools are genuinely distinct, but the boundaries between several categories are unclear enough that an agent could easily choose the wrong audit, memory, or compression tool.
Every tool uses the same sqo_ snake_case prefix, which makes the set easy to recognize and scan. However, the suffix pattern mixes noun phrases (sqo_dead_code, sqo_memory_vault, sqo_blast_radius) with verb-led names (sqo_compile_rules, sqo_verify_deps, sqo_edit_symbol), so it is mostly consistent rather than perfectly verb_noun throughout.
With 53 tools, the surface is far beyond a well-scoped MCP set and is likely to overwhelm tool selection. Many tools are near-duplicates or subsumed by orchestrator tools like sqo_pr_review and sqo_autopilot, so the count is an extreme mismatch for the server's purpose.
The surface broadly covers repo analysis, context compression, auditing, memory, planning, quota tracking, test generation, and symbol editing, so most workflows in the stated domain have a tool. There are minor gaps around general whole-file read/write/list operations and direct build/test execution, but agents can work around these with the symbol-editing and analysis tools.