eds-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to eds-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for design tokens that gives AI agents read access to design systems, enabling token resolution, listing, and component usage lookups via natural language.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that exposes your design system components and tokens to AI agents, preventing duplicate component creation and hardcoded token values.22 npm9MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query a design system's components, tokens, icons, patterns, and usage or accessibility guidelines through standardized MCP tools, with pluggable adapters for different data sources.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to create and manage consistent multi-screen UI designs through a token-efficient MCP interface, with design system tokens, components, flows, and visual review.451 npm1AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI assistants structured access to a design system's tokens, components, guidelines, and patterns, enabling them to read, lint, and author design system data.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceThe Wellx Design System MCP enables AI agents to access the single source of truth for Wellx design, including tokens, component specs, rules, and search, ensuring consistent design implementation across surfaces.-
TDQS
Scored across 29 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: tokens, components, consumers, compliance, accessibility, scaffolding, etc. Even similar tools like 'search_components' and 'recommend_component' serve different query methods (keyword vs. natural language), eliminating ambiguity.
All 29 tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., list_token_groups, get_component, bundle_components, scaffold_component). There are no deviations or mixed conventions.
29 tools is above the typical well-scoped range (3-15) and falls into the 'heavy' category (16-25+). While each tool serves a specific purpose, the count is borderline and could benefit from consolidation in some areas (e.g., multiple search/find tools).
The tool surface covers the full design system lifecycle: discovery (list, search, recommend), retrieval (get, find), validation (lint, audit, contrast), scaffolding, compliance, and versioning. No obvious gaps for an agent working with the system.