Anki Card Manager (acm)
Related Servers
Alternatives to Anki Card Manager (acm)
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that integrates Claude with Anki flashcards, allowing users to review due cards and create new flashcards directly through conversation.1429 PyPI13MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants like Claude to interact with Anki flashcard decks, allowing users to create, manage, and update flashcards through natural language conversations.942MIT
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables large language models like Claude to automatically generate flashcards and sync them with Anki decks via a Dockerized MCP server using the AnkiConnect add-on.2-
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables Claude Code to create, manage, and search Anki flashcards directly from the terminal. It supports batch card creation, deck statistics retrieval, and synchronization with AnkiWeb for cross-platform review.8-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that bridges Claude AI with Anki flashcard app, allowing users to create and manage flashcards using natural language commands.9MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that integrates with Anki flashcard application, allowing LLM applications like Claude to interact with your Anki decks and cards.1186 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is minor overlap between acm_annotate, acm_auto_classify, and acm_ingest regarding classification. Also, acm_audit and acm_reorganize both involve duplicate detection. Overall, an agent can generally distinguish them.
All tools share the 'acm_' prefix and most use verb-based names (e.g., acm_annotate, acm_ingest). However, a few are nouns (acm_stats, acm_taxonomy), breaking the verb_noun pattern. Still, naming is largely predictable.
13 tools is well-suited for an Anki card manager. Each tool addresses a specific stage in the workflow (annotate, classify, ingest, review, sync, etc.) without being excessive or insufficient.
The tool set covers the core lifecycle: candidate annotation, classification, ingestion, review, sync, and audit. Minor gaps exist, such as lacking a direct card edit tool (though acm_resolve provides correction). Overall, the surface is comprehensive for the domain.