mcp-template
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-template
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA production-ready Python template for building MCP servers with enterprise features including registry integration, configuration management, structured logging, and extensible patterns for tools, resources, and prompts.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA production-grade, extensible Python template for building Model Context Protocol servers with support for Streamable HTTP and stdio transports. It provides a structured framework for implementing tools, resources, and prompts with built-in authentication, observability, and background task management.11MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA foundational template for building MCP servers in Python using Streamable HTTP transport. Provides example implementations of tools, resources, and prompts to help developers create custom MCP integrations for AI assistants.-
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceServes as a reusable Python FastMCP template that lets developers quickly scaffold and extend MCP servers with tools, resources, prompts, services, and schemas over stdio or HTTP.1-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProduction-ready MCP server template in Python with example tool, resource, and prompt.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA Python MCP server template with environment-driven configuration, key authentication with rotation, JSON logging, and a golden-set eval harness for building production-ready MCP servers.2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 50 tools
Many tools are near-duplicates with different names: gmail_archive_thread and gmail_inbox.archive, gmail_mark_thread_done and gmail_inbox.mark_done, gmail_composer.send and gmail_send, settings.subscribe and webhook_subscribe. An agent cannot reliably tell which variant is appropriate for a given request.
Naming is a mix of dot-separated app namespaces (gmail_inbox.set_focus, gmail_composer.save_draft), flat snake_case names (gmail_archive_thread, webhook_subscribe), and inconsistent verb orders. The same operation appears as both gmail_mark_thread_done and gmail_inbox.mark_done, so there is no predictable pattern.
At 50 tools, the surface is far too large for the apparent Gmail-plus-webhooks scope. Many tools are aliases for the same underlying actions split across UI and headless variants, and the set could likely be reduced by more than half.
The underlying workflows are well covered: Gmail connection, inbox reading and triage, draft compose/send/discard, attachments, reply/forward, archive/done/read, watch, a curation ledger, and webhook settings. Minor gaps like permanent trash or expanded label management exist but are not severe.