Skip to main content
Glama
EasyModeOnly

@ezquill/mcp-server

by EasyModeOnly
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to @ezquill/mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Memuaria MCP by memuaria

      Memuaria MCPofficial

      memuaria
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connects compatible AI assistants to Memuaria so they can retrieve account and book information, check memory or story draft status, and prepare changes for user review while personal data remains in the Memuaria cloud service.
      MIT

    • Amanuensis

      MikeZenko
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables collaborative manuscript editing where an AI agent reads the page, proposes changes scored against the writer's voice, and waits for acceptance or rejection before any text is committed.
      MIT

    • ORANO MCP Server

      infotik
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables a user's own AI agent to read their personal ORANO library—projects, tasks, research, roadmaps, and memory facts—as grounded context through read-only MCP tools.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct resource or action: project listing/detail/search, outline vs. scene, entity list/detail, timeline, feedback, and auth. There is little risk of an agent selecting the wrong tool for a given intent.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use a consistent lowercase snake_case verb_noun pattern: list_projects, get_project, search_project, get_outline, read_scene, list_entities, get_entity, get_timeline, list_feedback. authenticate and sign_out are the only exceptions but they are auth actions and still read predictably.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eleven tools is well within the ideal range for this domain. Each tool covers a distinct need without unnecessary duplication, and the auth tools are justified for a service that requires sign-in.

    Completeness4/5

    The read-side surface is thorough: projects, outline, scenes, entities, timeline, and feedback are all covered. The only notable gap is the absence of any create/update/delete operations, but that appears intentional for a read-only writing-project assistant.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources