lpb_create_page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the burden. It transparently states that this is a write operation, requires confirmation (需 confirm), and persists to a mock server (mock-server 落库). This discloses the key side effects and risk of the operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no fluff. It conveys the essential info (create, write, requires confirm, mock-server persistence) efficiently. Slightly terse but well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description explains the core behavior and confirm flag necessity, but does not mention what the tool returns (e.g., created page) or how the dry-run preview is presented. Given the tool's moderate complexity (dry-run vs confirm), this is a minor gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions, so the baseline is 3. The tool description itself adds no extra parameter meaning beyond what is already in the schema. The schema descriptions are informative but not supplemented by the tool description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a landing page (创建落地页), which is a specific verb and resource. It also distinguishes from sibling tools by noting it is a write operation requiring confirmation, and the name 'create' contrasts with update/delete/list/get siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives. It mentions it is a write operation and requires confirm, but gives no guidance on choosing this over lpb_update_page or lpb_delete_page. No mention of scenarios or conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.