Skip to main content
Glama
EHRC

policy-mcp

by EHRC

Related Servers

Alternatives to policy-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server providing 5 tools for hybrid search, clause retrieval, policy versioning, code lookup, and plan rider override queries over a synthetic medical-policy corpus.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides read-only access to official-source consultation through a remote MCP endpoint, with pay-per-query prepaid credit and no platform credentials required.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to list research topics, route queries across money-market, capital-market, bank-risk, market-liquidity, and China-economy domains, and fetch read-only structured results from bounded public evidence without requiring an account or API key.
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables querying enterprise records and retention policies from any MCP client over stdio, with read-only tools for searching records, fetching retention verdicts, identifying archival candidates, summarizing departments, forecasting retentions, and viewing audit history.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to ask plain-language questions and receive answers grounded only in documents the configured role is cleared to read, with the same access-controlled tools available across any client.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one searches policy documents, the other assesses claims. There is no meaningful overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow the same verb_noun snake_case pattern, making the naming predictable and consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is on the thin side, but the pair covers a focused read-only policy and claim-assessment use case. It feels slightly minimal rather than excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    The core workflows of searching policies and assessing claims are covered. Minor gaps exist around direct document retrieval or explanation, but agents can likely work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues