kommo_create_lead
Creates a new lead in Kommo CRM with name, price, status, and pipeline fields.
Instructions
Create a new lead
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | No | ||
| price | No | ||
| status_id | No | ||
| pipeline_id | No |
Creates a new lead in Kommo CRM with name, price, status, and pipeline fields.
Create a new lead
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | No | ||
| price | No | ||
| status_id | No | ||
| pipeline_id | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full behavioral burden. It only states 'Create a new lead' with no details about side effects, permissions, or implications of creation. This is insufficient for a mutation tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely short (one sentence) and thus concise, but it sacrifices necessary detail. It is front-loaded but not adequately informative.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the 4 parameters, lack of annotations, and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not specify behavior, defaults, or relationships to sibling tools, leaving significant gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 0% description coverage, and the description does not mention any parameters. It adds no meaning beyond the schema's field names and types, leaving the agent uninformed about parameter purposes.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Create a new lead' clearly states the verb and resource, but does not distinguish from sibling tools that also create entities (e.g., kommo_create_company). It is specific enough to identify the action, but lacks differentiation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as kommo_update_lead or kommo_create_deal. The description fails to provide context for appropriate usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/E0DUAR/kommo-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server