Skip to main content
Glama
E-R-Butch

goofish-z-mcp

by E-R-Butch

item.view

Access full product details via a browser-based view, returning more complete item data while reducing risk of anti-bot blocks.

Instructions

浏览器视角查看商品详情(字段比 item get 更全,抗风控)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
item_idYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observedv0.2.0

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

没有 annotations,描述承担了行为说明责任。它揭示了“浏览器视角”这一实现特征和“抗风控”这一风险相关行为,这些都无法从 schema 中获知。虽然未展开说明是否需要登录、权限或“抗风控”的具体限制,但“查看 / view”已经清楚暗示这是一次只读操作。

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

一句话同时包含核心动作、差异点和行为特征,括号内的补充信息紧凑且无重复。篇幅与工具复杂度匹配,没有冗余内容。

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

对于只有一个必填参数且有输出 schema 的只读查看工具,描述已覆盖用途、行为特征和与 item.get 的区分点。由于没有 annotations,若能再补充登录要求或“抗风控”的具体含义会更好,但整体信息量已经足够支撑安全调用。

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema 描述覆盖率为 0%,描述本身也没有补充 item_id 的含义或格式。不过该工具只有一个参数,参数名 item_id 和 schema 中的“Item Id”已经足够自明,且与“商品”语境吻合,因此没有造成实质混乱,但也没有提供额外语义。

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

描述以明确动词加对象开头:“浏览器视角查看商品详情”,并直接与兄弟工具 item.get 做差异对比(“字段比 item get 更全”),还给出了“抗风控”这一识别特征。Agent 无需查看 schema 就能判断该工具的作用和独特价值。

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

描述给出了相对 item.get 的选择依据:需要更全字段、需要浏览器视角或抗风控能力时,应使用 item.view。但没有明确说明何时应优先使用 item.get,例如对原始接口响应或更低调用成本有要求时,缺少显式排除条件。

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/E-R-Butch/Goofish-Z'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server