The two tools have perfectly distinct purposes: one retrieves a specific firearm by ID, while the other performs a broad search across the database. No ambiguity exists between lookup-by-identifier and search-by-criteria operations.

Both tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern. The singular/plural distinction (get_firearm vs search_firearms) logically reflects their respective functions of retrieving one versus finding many.

With only 2 tools, the server meets the minimum viable surface for a read-only database but feels thin. It covers basic retrieval workflows but lacks browsing, listing, or filtering tools that would enrich the firearms domain.

Core read operations (search and get) are present, but notable gaps exist for discovery workflows such as browsing categories, listing manufacturers, or filtering by specific attributes like caliber or action type. Agents can work around these with broad searches, but the surface is minimal.