Skip to main content
Glama
Dxfory

edgar-filings

by Dxfory
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to edgar-filings

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-edgar

      cmanohar
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to access SEC EDGAR data: search filings, extract sections, pull structured financials, and track insider transactions.
      17 npm
      MIT

    • edgar-mcp

      alinarashid
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables searching SEC EDGAR filings by full-text search and listing company filings, with accurate company name resolution to CIKs in code, avoiding hallucinated identifiers.
      2
      4 npm
      MIT

    • EdgarTools MCP

      sareegpt
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to download, parse, and analyze SEC EDGAR filings, including 10-K/Q reports, XBRL financial statements, and insider trading data. It provides structured access to institutional holdings, corporate events, and financial facts for comprehensive investment research.
      16
      MIT

    • insider-trading

      pipeworx-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables querying SEC EDGAR for Form 4 insider trades, 8-K material events, and Schedule 13D/G ownership filings for US-listed companies, with ticker, company name, or CIK lookup.
      32 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct data type: trading symbols, segment revenue, BDC non-accrual status, and Form 4 insider filings. There is no overlap in purpose or output, so an agent can reliably select the correct tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All four tools follow the consistent 'get_' prefix followed by a descriptive noun phrase (trading_symbols, segment_revenue, bdc_nonaccrual, form4). The naming pattern is predictable and uniform.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is a modest but reasonable number for a focused EDGAR data extraction server. Each tool addresses a specific analytical need, and the scope does not feel inflated; however, a few more supporting tools could round it out slightly.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set covers a few specialized extractors (symbols, segment revenue, BDC non-accrual, Form 4) but misses obvious core EDGAR operations like retrieving standard financial statements (balance sheet, income statement) or general filing search. The selection feels arbitrary and leaves significant gaps for a server claiming to cover 'edgar-filings'.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources