Skip to main content
Glama
Dwsy

mcp-feedback-enhanced

by Dwsy

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-feedback-enhanced

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that establishes feedback-oriented development workflows with a Web UI and desktop app, allowing users to provide interactive feedback to AI models through prompts, images, and session tracking.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that establishes feedback-oriented development workflows with dual Web UI and desktop application interfaces, enabling AI to confirm with users via prompts and real-time feedback to reduce speculative operations and improve efficiency.
      2
      48 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A feedback-oriented MCP server with a Web UI for AI development workflows, enabling interactive confirmations and reducing speculative tool calls.
      2
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An interactive feedback MCP server with a web UI, enabling AI-driven development workflows where AI can prompt users for feedback before taking actions, supporting platforms like Cursor, Cline, and Windsurf.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables interactive Qt popups and continuous conversation within IDEs, facilitating user feedback and multi-turn dialogues.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are entirely unrelated: interactive_feedback handles user feedback collection while get_system_info retrieves system environment details. No overlap or confusion is possible.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    The naming patterns differ significantly: 'interactive_feedback' is a compound noun, while 'get_system_info' follows a verb_noun convention. The mix of styles is inconsistent and does not suggest a unified naming scheme.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels thin and under-scoped for a 'feedback-enhanced' purpose. While not as extreme as a single tool, the count is borderline and does not convincingly cover a full feedback workflow.

    Completeness2/5

    The server name implies a focus on feedback, yet only one tool is directly related, and get_system_info is a disconnected addition. There are no tools for managing or retrieving past feedback sessions, making the surface significantly incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues