timestamp
Get the current Unix timestamp and ISO 8601 datetime for time synchronization in applications.
Instructions
Get current Unix timestamp and ISO 8601 datetime
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Get the current Unix timestamp and ISO 8601 datetime for time synchronization in applications.
Get current Unix timestamp and ISO 8601 datetime
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, but description uses 'Get' which implies a read-only, non-destructive operation. No additional behavioral traits are disclosed, but the tool is inherently simple and safe.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence that is front-loaded and concise with no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given zero parameters, no output schema, and simple operation, the description fully covers what the tool does—returns Unix timestamp and ISO 8601 datetime.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100%. The description does not need to add parameter details; baseline 4 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'Get' and the exact resource 'current Unix timestamp and ISO 8601 datetime'. It uniquely distinguishes from sibling tools like uuid, base64, etc.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit when-to-use or alternatives are provided. For such a simple tool, usage is self-evident, but formal guidelines would improve clarity.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Dusheh/myclaw-toolkit'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server