Skip to main content
Glama
Duro02
by Duro02

Related Servers

Alternatives to devin-subagents

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables MCP hosts to spawn, send input to, wait for, resume, and close provider-backed child agent sessions across Codex, Claude, and Grok adapters with configurable role presets, though it is experimental and not production-ready.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Agent orchestration system that runs coding-agent sessions (Claude Code, Codex) with policy mediation and exposes tools via MCP.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables launching and supervising local Codex and Claude Code agent sessions and one-shot tasks, exposing run, list, stop, and output operations over MCP with session-scoped permissions and sandbox controls.
      5
      4,779 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables any MCP host to delegate work to multiple coding-agent CLIs such as Codex, Claude Code, and Antigravity as subagents, preserving native sessions and supporting team-based supervision and agent-to-agent messaging.
      17
      27 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agent clients to safely connect to tools and execution resources through MCP with authorization, approvals, audit, chat-context isolation, SSH/Docker access, and long-running command session tracking.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes DeepSeek Harness agent capabilities over MCP so any MCP client can delegate real coding work to a running agent with its full toolset (bash, filesystem, todo, web). Turns are dispatched asynchronously into sessions and then tracked through status, tail, wait, cancel, compact, and rename tools, with the session log as the source of truth so results survive restarts.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes: spawn creates sessions, send queues prompts, poll and wait observe but in different modes (snapshot vs. event log vs. blocking on attention), interrupt/stop/resume manage lifecycle, list enumerates, permission handles approvals, set_mode/set_model configure. Minor overlap between poll and wait (both report on state) but their interfaces are distinct enough to disambiguate.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most are short imperative verbs (spawn, send, poll, wait, interrupt, stop, resume, list, permission) with a few two-word names (set_mode, set_model). The style is consistent (all lowercase, underscore for compound names), but the verbs are not a predictable verb_noun pattern (e.g., no create_session vs. list_sessions). Some naming like 'permission' is a noun rather than a verb (grant_permission would be clearer).

    Tool Count5/5

    Twelve tools is well-scoped for a subagent management server. Each tool addresses a distinct lifecycle aspect: creation, communication, observation, control, listing, permission, and configuration. No redundancy in count, and the size supports both granular control and ease of discovery.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the full lifecycle: create (spawn), interact (send), observe (poll/wait), control (interrupt/stop/resume), enumerate (list), authorize (permission), and configure (set_mode/set_model). Missing features like killing without resume or session cleanup are not core gaps; they're likely handled via stop and resume. The tool set is comprehensive for subagent management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues