NebulaMind

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Fails to disclose pagination behavior, whether returned items include content or just metadata, performance characteristics, or access restrictions implied by 'all'.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with verb, zero redundancy. Appropriate length for zero-parameter operation with output schema coverage.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Sufficient for a simple enumeration tool given output schema exists to define return structure. However, in context of rich wiki system (8 siblings including content retrieval tools), lacks guidance on relationship to 'read_page'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Zero parameters present; baseline score applies per rubric. Schema coverage is vacuously 100%.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States clear verb ('List') and resource ('wiki pages') with scope ('all'). Distinguishes from 'read_page' implicitly via 'List' vs implied single-page read, though explicit differentiation from siblings is absent.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use vs alternatives like 'read_page' (which retrieves content of one page) or 'get_knowledge_graph'. Agent must infer usage from verb alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.